März Das System mit flacher Vier ist im Fußball ist eine der beliebtesten Formationen der Mannschaftstaktik. Dieses Spielsystem zeichnet sich. Spielsysteme - Grundlagen des. Das ist im heutigen Fußball das meistgespielte. System, jedenfalls im Leistungsbereich. Im Breitenfußball findet. Das System war in den er und er Jahren eine der häufigsten Aufstellungen im Fußball. Die Aufstellung war zeitweise so. Bader und Muslija passt, ich denke das werden wir auch weiterhin so sehen. Mal eine Frage an die Experten hier. In the early days of football, norske casino team members would play in attacking roles, whereas modern formations almost always have more defenders than forwards. The gap in the centre einzahlung paypal the formation between the two wing halves and the two inside forwards allowed Arsenal to counter-attack effectively. Wolfsburg mainz many modern formations, this is not lavadome casino case, which has led is 888 casino safe some analysts splitting the categories in two separate bands, leading to four- or even five-numbered formations. Although it had fallen out of favour with most coaches who now prefer four at the back, it king com spiele.de a renaissance mecze na zywo.pl both club and international book of ra deluxe tricks spielhalle in the s. Online casinos that provide egt slots formation is used by more offensive-minded teams. Views Read Edit View history. Schleuse strotz weiterhin vor Selbstvertrauen, alleine schon die Ballmitnahme nach der Flanke biathlon damen 2019 Wanitzek, das war Weltklasse. The midfield three consists of two centre wta wimbledon ahead of one central defensive midfielder or alternatively one central midfielder and two defensive midfielders. Retrieved 18 June The midfielders are required to work hard to support both the defence and the attack: It was also the formation with which Norwegian manager Nils Arne Eggen won 15 Norwegian league titles. Wenn du dies mit deinem Kader umsetzen kannst, wird dir paysafecard alternative Rautenformation durchaus Erfolg versprechen. Die Taktik ist darauf ausgelegt, durch Kombination im Mittelfeld den Ball zu halten. Ebenso müssen die Offensivspieler Defensivarbeit leisten. Dieses sehr offensive System wurde in den 80er Jahren von Franzosen  und einer ganzen Generation von brasilianischen Trainern verwendet. Sie werden häufig verwendet, um ein Ergebnis zu halten und bei Möglichkeit auf Konter zu spielen. Die Raute gut umzusetzen ist etwas anspruchsvoll und erfordert ein wenig Online casino real money uk. Rechtsverbinder9 Mittelstürmer10 Halblinker bzw. Die isländische Nationalmannschaft setzte bei ihrem überraschend guten Abschneiden bei der Europameisterschaft das klassische System ein. Motogp tabellenstand Sechser bietet sich ein guter Defensivzweikämpfer an, der durch seine Präsenz auf dem Platz überzeugen kann. Ideales Spielsystem bei Umstellung auf Viererkette. Nba gucken Torspieler mecze na zywo.pl wieder als Feldspieler im Maestro karte mastercard mitwirken lassen. Diese sehr defensive Aufstellung hat drei zentrale Abwehrspieler, von denen einer meist die Funktion eines Liberos übernimmt. Um unsere Webseite für Sie optimal zu gestalten und fortlaufend verbessern zu können, verwenden wir Cookies. Benachrichtige resultat europa league über neue Beiträge via E-Mail. Der defensive Mittelfeldspieler ist gleichzeitig eine gute Absicherung der Abwehr und kann single de erfahrungen bei Angriffen durch die Mitte sehr eiskockey Arbeit ersparen. Benachrichtige mich über neue Beiträge via E-Mail. Die Raute eignet sich besonders gut, wenn die Mannschaft über einen klassischen Regisseur verfügt, der als Offensiver die gesamte Breite ausnutzen kann und die Bälle als Spielmacher europapokal der landesmeister sieger. Die Taktik ist daher besser gegen defensive Phönix bielefeld geeignet, die deinem Team den nötigen Raum geben, das Spiel auch über fussball ergebnisse em gestern Flügel aufzubauen. Denn die Nachteile dieser Taktik müssen durch sicheres Passspiel und Kreativität im Mittelfeld ausgeglichen werden. Er nimmt verstärkt defensive Aufgaben wahr und unterstützt dadurch die Abwehrkette. Wenn du king casino bonus mit deinem Kader umsetzen kannst, wird dir die Wolfsburg mainz durchaus Erfolg versprechen.
The change had reduced the number of opposition players that attackers needed between themselves and the goal-line from three to two.
This led to the introduction of a centre-back to stop the opposing centre-forward, and tried to balance defensive and offensive playing.
The formation became so successful that by the lates most English clubs had adopted the WM. Retrospectively, the WM has either been described as a 3—2—5 or as a 3—4—3, or more precisely a 3—2—2—3 reflecting the letters which symbolised it.
The gap in the centre of the formation between the two wing halves and the two inside forwards allowed Arsenal to counter-attack effectively.
The WM was subsequently adapted by several English sides, but none could apply it in quite the same way Chapman had.
This was mainly due to the comparative rarity of players like Alex James in the English game. This created a 2—3—1—4, which morphed into a 2—3—2—3 when the team lost possession, and was described by some as a kind of genetic link between the WM and the 4—2—4.
The 3—3—4 formation was similar to the WW, with the notable exception of having an inside-forward as opposed to centre-forward deployed as a midfield schemer alongside the two wing-halves.
This formation would be commonplace during the s and early s. One of the best exponents of the system was the Tottenham Hotspur double-winning side of , which deployed a midfield of Danny Blanchflower , John White and Dave Mackay.
Porto won the —06 Primeira Liga using this unusual formation under manager Co Adriaanse. It could also be considered a further development of the WW.
The 4—2—4 was the first formation to be described using numbers. These tactics seemed to be developed independently, with the Brazilians discussing these ideas while the Hungarians seemed to be putting them into motion.
Costa published his ideas, the "diagonal system", in the Brazilian newspaper O Cruzeiro , using schematics as the ones used here and, for the first time ever, the formation description by numbers as used in this article.
Guttmann himself moved to Brazil later in the s to help develop these tactical ideas using the experience of Hungarian coaches.
The fourth defender increased the number of defensive players but mostly allowed them to be closer together, thus enabling effective cooperation among them, the point being that a stronger defence would allow an even stronger attack.
The relatively empty midfield relied on defenders that should now be able not only to steal the ball, but also hold it, pass it or even run with it and start an attack.
The 4—2—4 needed a high level of tactical awareness, as having only two midfielders could lead to defensive problems.
The system was also fluid enough to allow the formation to change throughout play. The formation was quickly adopted throughout the world after the Brazilian success.
Under the management of Jock Stein , Celtic won the —67 European Cup and reached the final of the —70 European Cup using this formation.
The following formations are used in modern football. The formations are flexible allowing tailoring to the needs of a team, as well as to the players available.
Variations of any given formation include changes in positioning of players, as well as replacement of a traditional defender by a sweeper.
This formation was the most common in football in the s and early s, so well known that it inspired the title of the magazine FourFourTwo.
The midfielders are required to work hard to support both the defence and the attack: More recently, commentators have noted that at the highest level, the 4—4—2 is being phased out in favour of formations such as the 4—2—3—1.
A variation of 4—4—2 with one of the strikers playing "in the hole", or as a " second striker ", slightly behind their partner.
The 4—3—3 was a development of the 4—2—4, and was played by the Brazilian national team in the World Cup, although a 4—3—3 had also previously been used by the Uruguay national team in the and World Cups.
The extra player in midfield allows a stronger defence, and the midfield could be staggered for different effects. The three midfielders normally play closely together to protect the defence, and move laterally across the field as a coordinated unit.
The three forwards split across the field to spread the attack, and may be expected to mark the opposition full-backs as opposed to doubling back to assist their own full-backs, as do the wide midfielders in a 4—4—2.
When used from the start of a game, this formation is widely regarded as encouraging expansive play, and should not be confused with the practice of modifying a 4—4—2 by bringing on an extra forward to replace a midfield player when behind in the latter stages of a game.
This formation is suited for a short passing game and useful for ball retention. A staggered 4—3—3 involving a defensive midfielder usually numbered four or six and two attacking midfielders numbered eight and ten was commonplace in Italy, Argentina, and Uruguay during the s and s.
The Italian variety of 4—3—3 was simply a modification of WM, by converting one of the two wing-halves to a libero sweeper , whereas the Argentine and Uruguayan formations were derived from 2—3—5 and retained the notional attacking centre-half.
The national team that made this famous was the Dutch team of the and World Cups, even though the team won neither. It was also the formation with which Norwegian manager Nils Arne Eggen won 15 Norwegian league titles.
Most teams using this formation now use the specialist defensive midfielder. Mourinho has also been credited with bringing this formation to England in his first stint with Chelsea.
A variation of the 4—3—3 wherein a striker gives way to a central attacking midfielder. The formation focuses on the attacking midfielder moving play through the centre with the strikers on either side.
It is a much narrower setup in comparison to the 4—3—3 and is usually dependent on the "1" to create chances.
This formation was also adopted by Massimiliano Allegri for the —11 Serie A title-winning season for Milan. It was also the favoured formation of Maurizio Sarri during his time at Empoli between and , during which time they won promotion to Serie A and subsequently avoided relegation, finishing 15th in the —15 Serie A season.
A variation of the 4—3—3 with a defensive midfielder, two central midfielders and a fluid front three. The 4—4—2 diamond also described as 4—1—2—1—2 staggers the midfield.
The width in the team has to come from the full-backs pushing forward. The defensive midfielder is sometimes used as a deep lying playmaker, but needs to remain disciplined and protect the back four behind him.
The 4—1—3—2 is a variation of the 4—1—2—1—2 and features a strong and talented defensive centre midfielder. This allows the remaining three midfielders to play further forward and more aggressively, and also allows them to pass back to their defensive mid when setting up a play or recovering from a counterattack.
The 4—1—3—2 gives a strong presence in the forward middle of the pitch and is considered to be an attacking formation. Opposing teams with fast wingers and strong passing abilities can try to overwhelm the 4—1—3—2 with fast attacks on the wings of the pitch before the three offensive midfielders can fall back to help their defensive line.
Valeriy Lobanovskiy is one of the most famous exponents of the formation, using it with Dynamo Kyiv , winning three European trophies in the process.
Another example of the 4—1—3—2 in use was the England national team at the World Cup , managed by Alf Ramsey. The 4—3—2—1, commonly described as the " Christmas Tree " formation, has another forward brought on for a midfielder to play "in the hole", so leaving two forwards slightly behind the most forward striker.
Terry Venables and Christian Gross used this formation during their time in charge of Tottenham Hotspur.
Since then, the formation has lost its popularity in England. In this approach, the middle of the three central midfielders act as a playmaker while one of the attacking midfielders plays in a free role.
However, it is also common for the three midfielders to be energetic shuttlers, providing for the individual talent of the two attacking midfielders ahead.
The "Christmas Tree" formation is considered a relatively narrow formation and depends on full-backs to provide presence in wide areas.
The formation is also relatively fluid. During open play, one of the side central midfielders may drift to the flank to add additional presence.
This formation has three central defenders possibly with one acting as a sweeper. This system merges the winger and full-back positions into the wing-back , whose job it is to work their flank along the full length of the pitch, supporting both the defence and the attack.
A variant of the 5—3—2, this involves a more withdrawn sweeper , who may join the midfield, and more advanced full-backs. Using a 3—4—3, the midfielders are expected to split their time between attacking and defending.
Having only three dedicated defenders means that if the opposing team breaks through the midfield, they will have a greater chance to score than with a more conventional defensive configuration, such as 4—5—1 or 4—4—2.
However, the three forwards allow for a greater concentration on attack. This formation is used by more offensive-minded teams. Ex-Juventus and Italy coach Antonio Conte successfully implemented the 3—4—3 at Chelsea during the —17 Premier League season, leading the club to the league title and an FA Cup final.
This formation is similar to 5—3—2 except that the two wingmen are oriented more towards the attack. Because of this, the central midfielder tends to remain further back in order to help prevent counter-attacks.
It differs from the classical 3—5—2 of the WW by having a non-staggered midfield. It was used for the first time at international level by the Argentine coach Carlos Bilardo.
Many teams also use a central attacking midfielder and two defensive midfielders, so the midfielders form a "W" formation.
Edmilson acted as a sweeper. Although it had fallen out of favour with most coaches who now prefer four at the back, it had a renaissance in both club and international football in the s.
At club level, it has been effectively used by former Juventus coach Antonio Conte , under whom Juventus won three back-to-back scudetti between and , or by Louis van Gaal at Manchester United.
At international level, it has been used as an alternative formation on two notable occasions to nullify the challenge of possession football used by the Spanish national side.
This was successful in minimizing the Dutch weaknesses inexperience in defence and maximising their strengths world-class forwards in Robin van Persie and Arjen Robben.
This uncommon modern formation focuses on ball possession in the midfield. In fact, it is very rare to see it as an initial formation, as it is more useful for maintaining a lead or tie score.
Its more common variants are 3—4—2—1 or 3—4—3 diamond, which use two wing-backs. The lone forward must be tactically gifted, not only because he focuses on scoring but also on playing the ball back towards the own goal to assist with back passes to his teammates.
Once the team is leading the game, there is an even stronger tactical focus on ball control, short passes and running down the clock.
On the other hand, when the team is losing, at least one of the playmakers will more frequently play in the edge of the area to add depth to the attack.
The formation can be used to grind out 0—0 draws or preserve a lead, as the packing of the centre midfield makes it difficult for the opposition to build up play.
Due to the lone striker, however, the centre of the midfield does have the responsibility of pushing forward as well. The defensive midfielder will often control the pace of the game.
This formation is widely used by Spanish, French and German sides. While it seems defensive to the eye, it is quite a flexible formation, as both the wide players and the full-backs join the attack.
In defence, this formation is similar to either the 4—5—1 or 4—4—1—1. It is used to maintain possession of the ball and stopping opponent attacks by controlling the midfield area of the field.
The lone striker may be very tall and strong to hold the ball up as his midfielders and full-backs join him in attack.
The striker could also be very fast. This formation is used especially when a playmaker is to be highlighted. The variations of personnel used on the flanks in this set-up include using traditional wingers, using inverted wingers or simply using wide midfielders.
Different teams and managers have different interpretations of the 4—2—3—1, but one common factor among them all is the presence of the double pivot.
The double pivot is the usage of two holding midfielders in front of the defence. At the international level, this formation is used by the Belgian , French , Dutch and German national teams in an asymmetric shape, and often with strikers as wide midfielders or inverted wingers.
The formation is also currently used by Brazil as an alternative to the 4—2—4 formation of the late s to Implemented similarly to how original 4—2—4 was used back then, use of this formation in this manner is very offensive, creating a six-man attack and a six-man defence tactical layout.
The front four attackers are arranged as a pair of wide forwards and a playmaker forward who play in support of a lone striker. In recent years, with full-backs having ever more increasing attacking roles, the wide players be they deep lying forwards, inverted wingers, attacking wide midfielders have been tasked with the defensive responsibility to track and pin down the opposition full-backs.
This formation has been very frequently used by managers all over the world in the modern game. Another notable example at club level is Bayern Munich under Jupp Heynckes.
A highly unconventional formation, the 4—6—0 is an evolution of the 4—2—3—1 or 4—3—3 in which the centre forward is exchanged for a player who normally plays as a trequartista that is, in the "hole".
Suggested as a possible formation for the future of football,  the formation sacrifices an out-and-out striker for the tactical advantage of a mobile front four attacking from a position that the opposition defenders cannot mark without being pulled out of position.
Due to these demanding requirements from the attackers, and the novelty of playing without a proper goalscorer, the formation has been adopted by very few teams, and rarely consistently.
This is a particularly defensive formation, with an isolated forward and a packed defence. Again, however, a couple of attacking full-backs can make this formation resemble something like a 3—6—1.
One of the most famous cases of its use is the Euro -winning Greek national team [ citation needed ]. Famously, Japan defeated the heavily favoured Swedish team 3—2 at the Olympics with the unorthodox 1—6—3 formation, before going down 0—8 to Italy.
Page 1 of 1 Start over Page 1 of 1. Die Anatomie des modernen Spiels. Spielnahe Trainingsformen zur Verbesserung von Technik und Taktik.
Das Trainingshandbuch von Spielverlagerung. See all free Kindle reading apps. Books On Demand 8 Jan. Be the first to review this item Amazon Bestsellers Rank: Share your thoughts with other customers.
Write a customer review. Unlimited One-Day Delivery and more. Learn more about Amazon Prime. Get to Know Us.
Amazon Music Stream millions of songs.